Skip to main content

Isolated Skills or Multiple Skills?

 

We are coming off about ten years of teaching skills in isolation.  At the time, it seemed like a sound idea. Struggling with the main idea? Spend more time on the main idea. We spent a lot of time focused on three-week units around one skill. But what teachers noticed was, it didn't work! They still didn't get the main idea!!!

       Fast forward to 2019 and the Science of Reading movement....the first book I read that changed my thinking was Natalie Wexler's the Knowledge Gap.   I will spend another blog post synthesizing takeaways from this later.  In all honesty, this book made sense to me. Why weren't the kids getting these skills in isolation? We had taught many, many lessons on them!  Wexler says it's not because of the skill, it has more to do with the information in the text they are reading. If you have no background knowledge, then you can't decipher the meaning of the text.  

      Students need to be exposed to multiple skills in a passage or story because the complex text is multi-faceted.  Think about the last book you read.  Did you only concentrate on the main idea? Or did you think about the characters and how they interacted together? Was the setting so descriptive that it almost was one of the characters itself? Was the conflict something that kept you up at night while you wondered how it would end?  This is where the true understanding of a text happens - not by just focusing on one skill. 

     But what about the idea of close reading - how does that fit in? Well, in essence, it matches multiple skills perfectly. My school has adopted a literacy curriculum that uses close reading for students in grades K-5.  It teaches literacy units around one central topic or idea and all the books connect to and build upon that idea. Next, the stories are read aloud (yes, read aloud) to the students the first time. As we do the read-aloud, we ask questions that help the students understand what the text says.  The next days, we go back to certain portions of the story and look deeper at how the text works and what the text means.  Our students may work collaboratively to answer these questions or you could continue to answer them,  in whole group discussions. 

     Does this work? Absolutely! In the first year that we switched to this model out, State Mandated Reading Test scores were one of the few schools in our district to increase, while everyone else decreased. Did I mention we were able to start this during the pandemic last year? In our second year of teaching this way, our STARS scores are making 30+ point growth from beginning to mid-year. 

       I realize that we are very lucky that we have this as our curriculum.  But not everyone does.  So I have decided to create some resources for close reading that include stories in a text set that are based around one topic. This will help to build background knowledge! Questions will be based on the Depth of Knowledge levels and will be higher level.  Students will look at the language and analyze sentence structure as well as respond to the readings. 

      My first resource that was created for a three-week literacy unit is for K-2.  It is called Animals in Winter. It integrated science and literacy as well as critical thinking. 





I'd love to know what you think! 

Leslie



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A New Way of thinking about comprehension

How many times have we, teachers, worried about testing to determine whether our students understand a comprehension skill or strategy?  In LETRS, Moats and Tolman talk about the many hidden mental activities that happen in comprehension. In other words, comprehension is more of a process than a product.  Well, that makes sense.  So what are those processes of comprehension ?  Monitoring comprehension - my favorite strategy for this is STP (Stop, Think, Paraphrase) Reading with appropriate pace - pacing actually correlates to understanding text Making inferences as you read - what are the characters thinking or feeling?  Making a mental model to organize thinking  and understanding Making connections in the text with views and background knowledge  How can we support those processes of comprehension?  Reading multiple texts  around one topic helps to build background knowledge.  In another blog I will talk moe about this critical component of learning. A final component that will b

Winter Read Aloud using the Science of Reading for Comprehension

  Winter Read Aloud I found this book recently and fell in love with it for many reasons -  family relationships diverse family (from Lebanon) sensory details - which connects to onomatopoeias character traits and points of view and most of all SNOW...       In switching from the old idea of reading multiple books for exposure to isolated skills, I designed this mini-unit around the fundamentals of the comprehension side of the Science of Reading.   Verbal reasoning  is woven into the unit in several ways. T his unit includes opportunities for inferencing as well as Visible Thinking Routines like  See, Think, Wonder , and the  Circle of Viewpoints.  Some are used to build background knowledge and some are used to reflect on the learning.   The lessons are broken into three parts -  Before Reading Background Knowledge - this book can be read in isolation or with other winter read-aloud books to build knowledge about a snowy day.  You could read this before a big snowstorm, as part of